Thanks, everyone, for the good discussions and votes. The vote has been open for 72hrs, and has three binding votes (Harsha, Rajini and Mani Kumar), and one non-biding vote(Satish Duggana), and no negative votes. so the KIP vote passes!
I'll close my vote and create an actual change for review. On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:32 AM Manikumar <manikumar.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks for the KIP. LGTM. > > Thanks. > Manikumar > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 1:42 PM Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks for the KIP, Sandeep! > > > > Regards, > > > > Rajini > > > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 4:40 AM Satish Duggana <satish.dugg...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Satish. > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 5:18 AM Harsha Chintalapani <ka...@harsha.io> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks for the KIP Sandeep. > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Harsha > > > > On Jul 29, 2019, 12:22 PM -0700, Sandeep Mopuri <mpr...@gmail.com>, > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi all, after some good discussion > > > > > <https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg99419.html> > > > about the > > > > > KIP > > > > > < > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-492%3A+Add+java+security+providers+in+Kafka+Security+config > > > >, > > > > > I'm starting the voting. > > > > > > > > > > This KIP proposes adding new security configuration to accept > custom > > > > > security providers that can provide algorithms for SSL or SASL. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > M.Sai Sandeep > > > > > > -- Thanks, M.Sai Sandeep
