Thanks, everyone, for the really good discussion. The vote has been open for 6 days, and has three binding votes (Guozhang, Bill, Matthias), in addition to my own non-binding +1, so the KIP vote passes!
Next, I'll close my POC PR and put together an actual change set for review. Thanks again, all, -John On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 4:58 PM Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On 7/29/19 11:59 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote: > > Thanks for the KIP. > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > -Bill > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:12 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> Yeah I think I agree with you. > >> > >> +1 (binding) from me. > >> > >> > >> Guozhang > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 7:43 AM John Roesler <j...@confluent.io> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Guozhang, > >>> > >>> Thanks! I just replied in the discuss thread. I agree with what you're > >>> proposing, but would like to consider it outside the scope of this KIP, > >> if > >>> that's ok with you. > >>> > >>> -John > >>> > >>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 5:38 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi John, > >>>> > >>>> I left another question regarding Transformer in the DISCUSS thread. > >>> Other > >>>> than that I think this KIP is ready. Thanks! > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Guozhang > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 9:01 AM John Roesler <j...@confluent.io> > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi Dev, > >>>>> > >>>>> After a good discussion, I'd like to start the vote for KIP-478 > >>>>> (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/2SkLBw). > >>>>> > >>>>> The proposal is to deprecate the existing interface > >>>>> org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.Processor<KIn, VIn> in favor of a > >>>>> new one, org.apache.kafka.streams.processor.api.Processor<KIn, VIn, > >>>>> KOut, VOut> that parameterizes both the input and output types. > >>>>> > >>>>> This change enables both the Streams DSL internal code and external > >>>>> Processor API code to improve their type safety and protect > >> themselves > >>>>> from type-level bugs. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> -John > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> -- Guozhang > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> -- Guozhang > >> > > > >
