+1 (non binding)
Thanks for the KIP!

On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 2:23 AM David Arthur <davidart...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1 binding, looks like a nice improvement. Thanks!
>
> -David
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 6:17 PM Justine Olshan <jols...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I wanted to let you all know the KIP has been updated. The
> > ComputedPartition class has been removed in favor of simply returning an
> > integer to represent the record's partition.
> > In short, the implications of this change mean that keyed records will also
> > trigger a change in the sticky partition. This was done for a case in which
> > there may be keyed and non-keyed records.
> > Upon testing, this did not significantly change the latency for records
> > with keyed values.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Justine
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 3:07 AM M. Manna <manme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1(na)
> > >
> > > On Sat, 13 Jul 2019 at 22:17, Stanislav Kozlovski <
> > stanis...@confluent.io>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 6:02 PM Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you for the KIP. This was long awaited.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 5:15 PM Justine Olshan <jols...@confluent.io>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hello all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd like to start the vote for KIP-480 : Sticky Partitioner.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-480%3A+Sticky+Partitioner
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you,
> > > > > > Justine Olshan
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Gwen Shapira
> > > > > Product Manager | Confluent
> > > > > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > > > > Follow us: Twitter | blog
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best,
> > > > Stanislav
> > > >
> > >
> >

Reply via email to