Hey, Bruno and Bill, Since you cast your votes before the KIP was updated, do you mind re-casting just so we can be sure you're still in favor?
Thanks, -John On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 2:01 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 (binging). > > This is a great cleanup, thanks John! > > Guozhang > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 11:26 AM Ryanne Dolan <ryannedo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thanks for the interesting discussion. > > > > Ryanne > > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019, 2:49 PM Ryanne Dolan <ryannedo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > John, I'm glad to learn I'm not the only one who's re-read the metrics > > > code multiple times. > > > > > > I do wonder if the proposed names could be improved further though, given > > > that "sum", "total", and "count" are roughly synonymous. I'm already > > > scratching my head at what "TotalSum" means. It's clear in the context of > > > your matrix, juxtaposed with the alternatives, but when I come across the > > > name in isolation I suspect I'll be back looking at the implementation > > > again. > > > > > > Ryanne > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019, 1:45 PM John Roesler <j...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Kafka devs, > > >> > > >> Yesterday, I proposed KIP-488 as a minor cleanup of some of our metric > > >> implementations. > > >> > > >> KIP-488: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/kkAyBw > > >> > > >> The change seems pretty uncontroversial, so I'm just going to open the > > >> vote now. > > >> > > >> Feel free to veto or just request more discussion if you disagree with > > >> the KIP. The vote will remain open for 72 hours. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> -John > > >> > > > > > > > > -- > -- Guozhang
