I'm confused. Surely the default quota applies on empty client IDs too?
otherwise it will be very difficult to enforce?
So setting the client name will only change something if there's already a
quota for that client?

On the other hand, I fully support switching to "easy-to-wildcard" template
for the client id.

On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 8:50 PM Arjun Satish <arjun.sat...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I just realized that setting the client.id on the will now trigger any
> quota restrictions (
> https://kafka.apache.org/documentation/#design_quotasconfig) on the
> broker.
> It seems like this PR will enforce quota policies that will either require
> admins to set limits for each task (since the chosen format is
> connector-*-id), or fallback to some default value.
>
> Maybe we should mention this in the backward compatibility section for the
> KIP. At the same time, since there is no way atm to turn off this feature,
> should this feature be merged and released in the upcoming v2.3? This is
> something the committers can comment better.
>
> Best,
>
>
> On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 5:13 PM Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > hell yeah!
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 9:08 AM Paul Davidson
> > <pdavid...@salesforce.com.invalid> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Since we seem to have agreement in the discussion I would like to start
> > the
> > > vote on KIP-411.
> > >
> > > See:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-411%3A+Make+default+Kafka+Connect+worker+task+client+IDs+distinct
> > >
> > > Also see the related PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/6097
> > >
> > > Thanks to everyone who contributed!
> > >
> > > Paul
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Gwen Shapira*
> > Product Manager | Confluent
> > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > Follow us: Twitter <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc> | blog
> > <http://www.confluent.io/blog>
> >
>


-- 
*Gwen Shapira*
Product Manager | Confluent
650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
Follow us: Twitter <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc> | blog
<http://www.confluent.io/blog>

Reply via email to