Hi all, This KIP passes with three +1 (binding) -- thanks Matthias, Bill, and Guozhang!
For those interested, feel free to check out and join the ongoing PR review here: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/6525 Cheers, Sophie On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 1:21 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding). > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 5:46 PM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks for the KIP Sophie. > > > > +1(binding) > > > > -Bill > > > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 12:14 AM Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> > > wrote: > > > > > Thanks for the KIP Sophie! > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > -Matthias > > > > > > On 4/8/19 5:26 PM, Sophie Blee-Goldman wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > There has been a positive reception so I'd like to call for a vote on > > > > KIP-445, augmenting our session store options with an in-memory > > version. > > > > This would round out our store API to offer in-memory and persistent > > > > versions of all three types of stores. > > > > > > > > KIP: > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-445%3A+In-memory+Session+Store > > > > PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/6525 > > > > JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8029 > > > > > > > > This would also open up the possibility of migrating some of the > > > > unit/integration tests to in-memory stores to speed things up a bit > ;) > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Sophie > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > -- Guozhang >
