On Wed, Jan 23, 2019, at 20:16, Matt Farmer wrote: > Would it be possible to get official images that aren't Confluent branded > and only include the things that are maintained by under the scope of the > Apache PMC?
Hi Matt, Apache doesn't officially distribute Docker images. The topic was discussed recently here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-270 >From LEGAL-270: > All official Apache releases are in source form; Docker images > can be built from our official source releases, but are derived > distributions analogous to, say, Debian packages. Matt wrote: > IIRC, the Confluent images typically include extras that are > maintained solely by Confluent. (e.g. implementation of code to work with > Confluent Schema Registry) Not all the images contain schema registry code. If you have questions, perhaps ask about them on Confluent's slack channels? See https://confluentcommunity.slack.com/ best, Colin > This is fine for most cases, but some > organizations care a lot about clean delineations of Intellectual Property > in upstream images. Having images that are exclusively those things that > come from the apache/kafka repo has some value to those organizations. > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 6:19 PM M. Manna <manme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > There should be confluent enterprise image-it should work without control > > centre etc. and basic open source items should stay the same. > > > > Could you kindly check ? > > > > On Tue, 15 Jan 2019 at 23:06, Олег Иванов <olivano...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Could you please create an official docker image of kafka? There are a > > lot > > > custom images in the dockerhub, but company's security policy allows only > > > official images. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > >
