Thanks for the KIP.

One side comment about rejected alternatives. I would remove the
sentence, because `StreamsMetadata` is part of IQ feature and not
related at all to this change -- thus, it does not seem to be a valid
alternative.


+1 (binding)


-Matthias

On 1/11/19 5:47 AM, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP Guozhang,
> 
> +1 for me.
> 
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 7:10 AM Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 05:09, John Roesler <j...@confluent.io> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Guozhang,
>>>
>>> It sounds reasonable to me. I'm +1 (nonbinding).
>>>
>>> -John
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 8:51 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello folks,
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to start a voting process for the following KIP:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-414%3A+Expose+Embedded+ClientIds+in+Kafka+Streams
>>>>
>>>> It is a pretty straight-forward and small augment to Stream's public
>>>> ThreadMetadata interface, as an outcome of the discussion on KIP-345.
>>> Hence
>>>> I think we can skip the DISCUSS thread and move on to voting directly.
>> If
>>>> people have any questions about the context of KIP-414 or KIP-345,
>> please
>>>> feel free to read these two wiki pages and let me know.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- Guozhang
>>>>
>>>
>>
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to