This update is much needed, thank you! Could you comment on the approach of
your method vs. using other open source tools like Uber's uReplicator or
the recently open-sourced Mirus from Salesforce? (
https://engineering.salesforce.com/open-sourcing-mirus-3ec2c8a38537). I
strongly believe Mirrormaker itself needs an upgrade, so I'm not
questioning that, but more on the technical side of the solution.

Thanks
Eno

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 11:19 PM Ryanne Dolan <ryannedo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Rhys, thanks for your enthusiasm!
>
> In your example, us-west.us-east.us-central.us-west.topic is an invalid
> "remote topic" name because us-west appears twice. MM2 will not replicate
> us-east.us-central.us-west.topic into us-west a second time, because the
> source topic already has us-west in the prefix. This is what I mean by
> "cycle detection" -- cyclical replication does not result in infinite
> recursion.
>
> It's important to note that MM2 does NOT disallow these sort of cycles, it
> just knows how to deal with them properly.
>
> Also notice this is done at the topic level, not per record. The records
> don't need any special header or anything for this cycle detection
> mechanism to work.
>
> Thanks!
> Ryanne
>
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 3:40 PM McCaig, Rhys <rhys_mcc...@comcast.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ryanne,
> >
> > This KIP is fantastic. It provides a great vision for how MirrorMaker
> > should evolve in the Kafka project.
> >
> > I have a question on cycle detection - In a scenario where I have 3
> > clusters replicating between each other, it seems it may be easy to
> > misconfigure the connectors if auto topic creation is turned on so that
> > records become replicated to increasingly longer topic names (until the
> > topic name limit is reached). Consider clusters us-west, us-central,
> > us-east:
> >
> > us-west: topic
> > us-central: us-west.topic
> > us-east: us-central.us-west.topic
> > us-west: us-east.us-central.us-west.topic
> > us-central: us-west.us-east.us-central.us-west.topic
> >
> > I’m not sure whether this scenario would actually justify implementing
> > additional measures to avoid such a configuration, rather than ensuring
> > that the documentation is clear on how to avoid such scenarios - would be
> > good to hear what others think on this.
> >
> > Excited to see the discussion on this one.
> >
> > Rhys
> >
> > > On Oct 15, 2018, at 9:16 AM, Ryanne Dolan <ryannedo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey y'all!
> > >
> > > Please take a look at KIP-382:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-382%3A+MirrorMaker+2.0
> > >
> > > Thanks for your feedback and support.
> > >
> > > Ryanne
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to