Thanks, +1 (binding). Ismael
On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 8:12 PM Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@apache.org> wrote: > KIP-336[1] has been merged so it is time to activate this thread > (KIP-331[2]). Last discussion is about "Should we add FunctionalInterface > annotation to Serializer and Deserializer". In discussion of KIP-336 we > mentioned that we probably add the default implementation for headless > method later. Hence, adding FunctionalInterface annotation is not suitable > now. > > KIP-331 has removed the change of adding FunctionalInterface annotation. > Please take a look again. > > [1] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=87298242 > [2] > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-331+Add+default+implementation+to+close%28%29+and+configure%28%29+for+Serializer%2C+Deserializer+and+Serde > > Cheers, > Chia-Ping > > > On 2018/07/20 10:56:59, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > Part of the motivation for this KIP is to make these interfaces > functional > > interfaces. But I think that may not be desirable due to the method that > > passes headers. So, it doesn't make sense to discuss two separate changes > > to the same interfaces in isolation, we should figure out how we want > them > > to work holistically. > > > > Ismael > > > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 3:50 AM Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > The KIP needs 3 binding votes to pass. > > > > > > Thanks for the reminder. I will reopen the ballot box until we get 3 > > > tickets. > > > > > > > I still think we should include the details of how things will look > like > > > > with the headers being passed to serializers/deserializers to ensure > > > > things actually make sense as a whole. > > > > > > This KIP is unrelated to the both methods - serialize() and > deserialize(). > > > We won't add the default implementation to them in this kip. Please > correct > > > me if I didn't catch what you said. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Chia-Ping > > > > > > On 2018/07/09 01:55:41, Ismael Juma <isma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > The KIP needs 3 binding votes to pass. I still think we should > include > > > the > > > > details of how things will look like with the headers being passed to > > > > serializers/deserializers to ensure things actually make sense as a > > > whole. > > > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 8 Jul 2018, 18:31 Chia-Ping Tsai, <chia7...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > > > > > The 72 hours has passed. The vote result of KIP-313 is shown below. > > > > > > > > > > 1 binding vote (Matthias J. Sax) > > > > > 4 non-binding votes (John Roesler, Richard Yu, vito jeng and > Chia-Ping) > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Chia-Ping > > > > > > > > > > On 2018/07/05 14:45:01, Chia-Ping Tsai <chia7...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > I would like to start voting on "KIP-331 Add default > implementation > > > to > > > > > close() and configure() for Serializer, Deserializer and Serde" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-331+Add+default+implementation+to+close%28%29+and+configure%28%29+for+Serializer%2C+Deserializer+and+Serde > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Chia-Ping > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
