Ok so we have only one binding vote up to now. I guess we need at least 3
binding votes.

Thanks

On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 at 09:59 Joan Goyeau <j...@goyeau.com> wrote:

> Matt, This is now all updated.
>
> On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 at 03:34 Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
>> Can you please update the KIP accordingly?
>>
>> It still says "make private" instead of "deprecating"
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>> On 9/6/18 10:07 AM, Attila Sasvári wrote:
>> > +1 (non-binding)
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 6:38 PM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> +1 for deprecating and copying the class over to internals.
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 6:56 AM, Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> +1
>> >>>
>> >>> -Bill
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 4:29 AM Joan Goyeau <j...@goyeau.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Sournds good, I'll make the deprecation and copy the class over.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 22:48 John Roesler <j...@confluent.io> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> I'm a +1 (non-binding) because we doubt the class is in use.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> If you decide to copy it to a private version and deprecate the
>> >>> original
>> >>>>> instead, as Matthias suggested, I would still be a +1.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Thanks,
>> >>>>> -John
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 6:47 AM Joan Goyeau <j...@goyeau.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Hi,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> As pointed out in this comment
>> >>>>>> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/5539#discussion_r212380648
>> >>> "This
>> >>>>>> class
>> >>>>>> was already defaulted to public visibility, and we can't retract it
>> >>>> now,
>> >>>>>> without a KIP.", the object FunctionConversions is only of internal
>> >>> use
>> >>>>> and
>> >>>>>> therefore should be private to the lib only so that we can do
>> >> changes
>> >>>>>> without going through KIP like this one.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> KIP:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-366%3A+Make+
>> >>> FunctionConversions+private
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Please make your votes.
>> >>>>>> Thanks
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> -- Guozhang
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>

Reply via email to