Hi All,
Thanks for all the comments on KIP-349.
I agree with Mathias’ comment that topic prioritization and Message chooser
are complimentary. And since the two API’s are not strongly coupled my
inclination is not to add MessageChooser to KIP-349.
MessageChoose could be done in a separate follow-on KIP (which I would be happy
to work on after).
I also agree with Colin’s comment that the use-cases should be clear. Hence
I’d like to make a second call to reply to this thread to elaborate with any
specific use-cases. After the use-cases are established I”ll then call for a
vote.
Cheers,
--
Nick
