Ewen - no as I don't believe they are never null. Whereas the
topicNameExtractor method returns null if it is the default extractor or
the extractor. So i think this would be better to be optional as it is
optionally returning a TopicNameExtractor

On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 at 23:01 Ewen Cheslack-Postava <e...@confluent.io>
wrote:

> Generally +1 (binding)
>
> It would be helpful to just provide the full, updated interfaces in the
> KIP and mark things as new with comments if needed. I had to go back and
> read the discussion thread to make sure I was understanding the intent
> correctly.
>
> Damian -- if we make that Optional, shouldn't the methods on Source also
> be Optional types?
>
> -Ewen
>
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 11:13 PM Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nishanth,
>>
>> I have one nit on the KIP. I think the topicNameExtractor method should
>> return Optional<TopicNameExtractor> rather than null.
>> Sorry I'm late here.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Damian
>>
>> On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 at 01:14 Nishanth Pradeep <nishanth...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > We need one more binding vote.
>> >
>> > Binding Votes:
>> >
>> >    - Matthias J. Sax
>> >    - Guozhang Wong
>> >
>> > Community Votes:
>> >
>> >    - Bill Bejeck
>> >    - Ted Yu
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Nishanth Pradeep
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 10:02 AM Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Thanks for the KIP!
>> > >
>> > > +1
>> > >
>> > > -Bill
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 2:39 AM Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > +1
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 11:13 PM, Matthias J. Sax <
>> > matth...@confluent.io
>> > > >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > +1 (binding)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > -Matthias
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On 7/25/18 7:47 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
>> > > > > > +1
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 7:24 PM Nishanth Pradeep <
>> > > > nishanth...@gmail.com>
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >> Hello,
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> I'm calling a vote for KIP-321:
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-321%3A+Update+
>> > > > > TopologyDescription+to+better+represent+Source+and+Sink+Nodes
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Best,
>> > > > > >> Nishanth Pradeep
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > -- Guozhang
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>

Reply via email to