> On Jul 26, 2018, at 11:09 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Boyang,
> 
> Thanks for the proposed KIP. I made a pass over the wiki and here are some
> comments / questions:
> 
> 1. In order to preserve broker compatibility, we need to make sure the
> broker version discovery logic can be integrated with this new logic. I.e.
> if a newer versioned consumer is talking to an older versioned broker who
> does not recognize V4, the client needs to downgrade its JoinGroupRequest
> version to V3 and not setting the member-id specifically. You can take a
> look at the ApiVersionsRequest and see how to work with it.
> 
> 2. There may exist some manners to validate that two different clients do
> not send with the same member id, for example if we pass along the
> host:port information from KafkaApis to the GroupCoordinator interface. But
> I think this is overly complicated the logic and may not worthwhile than
> relying on users to specify unique member ids.

Boyang,

Thanks for the KIP! How will the algorithm behave if multiple consumers provide 
the same member id?

-James

> 3. Minor: you would need to bumping up the version of JoinGroupResponse to
> V4 as well.
> 
> 4. Minor: in the wiki page, you need to specify the actual string value for
> `MEMBER_ID`, for example "member.id".
> 
> 5. When this additional config it specified by users, we should consider
> setting the default of internal `LEAVE_GROUP_ON_CLOSE_CONFIG` to false,
> since otherwise its effectiveness would be less.
> 
> 
> Guozhang
> 
> 
> 
>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 9:20 PM, Boyang Chen <bche...@outlook.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hey friends,
>> 
>> 
>> I would like to open a discussion thread on KIP-345:
>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-345%3A
>> +Reduce+multiple+consumer+rebalances+by+specifying+member+id
>> 
>> 
>> This KIP is trying to resolve multiple rebalances by maintaining the
>> consumer member id across rebalance generations. I have verified the theory
>> on our internal Stream application, and it could reduce rebalance time to a
>> few seconds when service is rolling restart.
>> 
>> 
>> Let me know your thoughts, thank you!
>> 
>> 
>> Best,
>> 
>> Boyang
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -- Guozhang

Reply via email to