Hi Florian, Thanks for the KIP. I think being able to add more context to the processor names would be useful.
I like the idea of adding a "withProcessorName" to Produced, Consumed and Joined. But instead of adding the "Processed" parameter to a large percentage of the methods, which would result in overloaded methods (which we removed quite a bit with KIP-182) what do you think of adding a method to the AbstractStream class "withName(String processorName)"? BTW I"m not married to the method name, it's the best I can do off the top of my head. For the methods that return void, we'd have to add a parameter, but that would at least cut down on the number of overloaded methods in the API. Just my 2 cents. Thanks, Bill On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 4:13 PM, Florian Hussonnois <fhussonn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to start a new discussion on following KIP : > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > 307%3A+Allow+to+define+custom+processor+names+with+KStreams+DSL > > This is still a draft. > > Looking forward for your feedback. > -- > Florian HUSSONNOIS >
