I agree with Ted. This change does not require a KIP. If ok with you, I
can delete the KIP page in the Wiki for you.

-Matthias


On 5/10/18 11:59 AM, Ted Yu wrote:
> Since the change is internal to *SensorAccess class, looks like KIP is not
> required.*
> 
> On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 11:54 AM, qingjun wu <wuqing...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Dear Kafka Developers,
>>
>> I opened a KIP and also a Jira ticket related to this. Can you please take
>> a look? It should be simple change to Kafka, but it should improve the
>> performance a lot.
>>
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-NEXT%3A+Get+rid+of+
>> unnecessary+read+lock
>>
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6722
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards
>>              吴清俊|Wade Wu
>>
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to