HI everyone.  Can we get 2 more binding votes on this KIP (and non-binding
votes, too)?

Ron

On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Ron,
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for the KIP!
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajini
>
> On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 4:55 AM, Ron Dagostino <rndg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone.  I would like to start the vote for KIP-255:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.
> action?pageId=75968876
> >
> > This KIP proposes to add the following functionality related to
> > SASL/OAUTHBEARER:
> >
> > 1) Allow clients (both brokers when SASL/OAUTHBEARER is the inter-broker
> > protocol as well as non-broker clients) to flexibly retrieve an access
> > token from an OAuth 2 authorization server based on the declaration of a
> > custom login CallbackHandler implementation and have that access token
> > transparently and automatically transmitted to a broker for
> authentication.
> >
> > 2) Allow brokers to flexibly validate provided access tokens when a
> client
> > establishes a connection based on the declaration of a custom SASL Server
> > CallbackHandler implementation.
> >
> > 3) Provide implementations of the above retrieval and validation features
> > based on an unsecured JSON Web Token that function out-of-the-box with
> > minimal configuration required (i.e. implementations of the two types of
> > callback handlers mentioned above will be used by default with no need to
> > explicitly declare them).
> >
> > 4) Allow clients (both brokers when SASL/OAUTHBEARER is the inter-broker
> > protocol as well as non-broker clients) to transparently retrieve a new
> > access token in the background before the existing access token expires
> in
> > case the client has to open new connections.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ron
> >
>

Reply via email to