When I ran test suite, I got one failure:
kafka.api.PlaintextConsumerTest > testAsyncCommit FAILED
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<5> but was:<1>
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:88)
at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:834)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:645)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:631)
at
kafka.api.BaseConsumerTest.awaitCommitCallback(BaseConsumerTest.scala:214)
at
kafka.api.PlaintextConsumerTest.testAsyncCommit(PlaintextConsumerTest.scala:513)
Not sure if anyone else saw similar error.
Cheers
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
>
> This is the fifth candidate for release of Apache Kafka 1.1.0.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=75957546
>
> A few highlights:
>
> * Significant Controller improvements (much faster and session expiration
> edge
> cases fixed)
> * Data balancing across log directories (JBOD)
> * More efficient replication when the number of partitions is large
> * Dynamic Broker Configs
> * Delegation tokens (KIP-48)
> * Kafka Streams API improvements (KIP-205 / 210 / 220 / 224 / 239)
>
> Release notes for the 1.1.0 release:
>
> http://home.apache.org/~rsivaram/kafka-1.1.0-rc4/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>
>
> *** Please download, test and vote by Tuesday March 27th 4pm PT.
>
>
> Kafka's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>
> http://kafka.apache.org/KEYS
>
>
> * Release artifacts to be voted upon (source and binary):
>
> http://home.apache.org/~rsivaram/kafka-1.1.0-rc4/
>
>
> * Maven artifacts to be voted upon:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/
>
>
> * Javadoc:
>
> http://home.apache.org/~rsivaram/kafka-1.1.0-rc4/javadoc/
>
>
> * Tag to be voted upon (off 1.1 branch) is the 1.1.0 tag:
>
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/tree/1.1.0-rc4
>
>
>
> * Documentation:
>
> http://kafka.apache.org/11/documentation.html
>
>
> * Protocol:
>
> http://kafka.apache.org/11/protocol.html
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Rajini
>
