Guozhang, renaming the class is an internal change and I think it's not
required to cover it in the KIP.


+1 (binding)


-Matthias

On 3/9/18 1:26 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> Hi John,
> 
> You mentioned you are going to do the renaming for the existing class
> to InternalMockProcessorContext
> but that seems not reflected on the KIP wiki, could you add that in the
> proposed changes section?
> 
> Other than that, I'm +1 on the KIP.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Guozhang
> 
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> +1
>> -------- Original message --------From: Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com>
>> Date: 3/9/18  12:29 PM  (GMT-08:00) To: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: Re:
>> [VOTE] KIP-267: Add Processor Unit Test Support to Kafka Streams Test Utils
>> Thanks for the KIP.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> -Bill
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 3:16 PM, John Roesler <j...@confluent.io> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I'd like to start voting on KIP-267, to introduce a MockProcessorContent
>>> enabling Processor, Transformer, and ValueTransformer authors to
>> unit-test
>>> their components.
>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
>>> 267%3A+Add+Processor+Unit+Test+Support+to+Kafka+Streams+
>>> Test+Utils?src=jira
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -John
>>>
>>
> 
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to