Jakub, have you had a chance to update the KIP with the latest changes? Would be great to start the vote today so that it's open long enough to adopt before the deadline on Tuesday. Let me know if I can help.
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 1:25 AM, Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz> wrote: > I have been thinking about this a bit more yesterday while updating the > code. I think you are right, we should use only the prefixed values if at > least one of them exists. Even I got quite easily confused what setup is > actually used when the fields are mixed :-). Randall was also in favour of > this approach. So I think we should go this way. I will update the KIP > accordingly. > > > > I'm fine with consistency, but maybe the thing to do here then is to > ensure > > that we definitely log the "effective" or "derived" config before using > it > > so there is at least some useful trace of what we actually used that can > be > > helpful in debugging. >
