The previous Apache git repos don't exist anymore. The new ones are at:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/?p=kafka.git
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/?p=kafka-site.git

In any case, we should merge to the GitHub repo now and the following PR
updates the merge script to default to that:

https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/4352

Ismael

On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote:

> It's done! Committers, please set up your account:
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
>
>> Forgot the link to the relevant Infra JIRA: https://issues.apache.or
>> g/jira/browse/INFRA-15676
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 11:59 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> GitBox migration will happen today. Committers, please make sure to
>>> associate your github ID with your apache.org account via id.apache.org,
>>> and make sure to enable 2 factor authentication in GitHub.
>>>
>>> Ismael
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks to everyone who voted and contributed to the discussion.
>>>>
>>>> The vote passes with 7 binding votes (Damian, Rajini, Jason, Gwen,
>>>> Guozhang, Sriram, Ismael) and 2 non-binding votes (Manikumar and Tom).
>>>>
>>>> I will file a JIRA ticket in the Apache Infra project requesting the
>>>> migration to GitBox.
>>>>
>>>> Ismael
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Tom Bentley <t.j.bent...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12 December 2017 at 20:38, Sriram Subramanian <r...@confluent.io>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > +1
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Manikumar <
>>>>> manikumar.re...@gmail.com>
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > > +1
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 9:49 PM, Rajini Sivaram <
>>>>> rajinisiva...@gmail.com
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > wrote:
>>>>> > >
>>>>> > > > +1
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > Thanks, Ismael!
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Damian Guy <
>>>>> damian....@gmail.com>
>>>>> > > wrote:
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > > +1
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 at 15:47 Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > Hi all,
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > The Apache Infra team has started a new project earlier this
>>>>> year
>>>>> > > > called
>>>>> > > > > > GitBox that supports two-way synchronization between GitHub
>>>>> and
>>>>> > > > > > git-wip-us.apache.org and, most importantly, provides
>>>>> GitHub write
>>>>> > > > > access
>>>>> > > > > > to committers. GitBox is not generally available yet, but
>>>>> > individual
>>>>> > > > > > projects can ask to be migrated.
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > I would like to start a vote on migrating kafka and
>>>>> kafka-site to
>>>>> > > > GitBox
>>>>> > > > > > and:
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > 1. Providing GitHub write access to committers (this
>>>>> requires dual
>>>>> > > > factor
>>>>> > > > > > authentication)
>>>>> > > > > > 2. Allowing merges via the GitHub UI as well as the existing
>>>>> merge
>>>>> > > > script
>>>>> > > > > > 3. Enabling protected branches for trunk and release
>>>>> branches so
>>>>> > that
>>>>> > > > > > merges via the GitHub UI can only be done if the tests pass
>>>>> and the
>>>>> > > PR
>>>>> > > > > has
>>>>> > > > > > been approved by a committer
>>>>> > > > > > 4. Only allowing the "squash and merge" strategy for GitHub
>>>>> UI
>>>>> > merges
>>>>> > > > > > 5. Updating the merge script so that the GitHub git repo is
>>>>> the
>>>>> > > target
>>>>> > > > of
>>>>> > > > > > the merge
>>>>> > > > > > 6. Disallowing force pushes to trunk and release branches
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > The discussion thread talks about some of the pros and cons
>>>>> (mostly
>>>>> > > > pros)
>>>>> > > > > > of this change:
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
>>>>> > 7031168e7026222169c66fed29f520
>>>>> > > > > 0fc4b561df28c242ccf706f326@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > The vote will run for 72 hours.
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > > > Ismael
>>>>> > > > > >
>>>>> > > > >
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > >
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to