Hi, Charly, Thanks for the proposal. Since the per partition level metric is likely not widely used, it's probably better to fix the metric name and make it more consistent. +1 from me.
We probably want to document this change in the upgrade section. Jun On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:45 AM, charly molter <charly.mol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Just a reminder that this vote is open. Let me know if you think this is > not a valuable change. > > Thanks! > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:48 AM, charly molter <charly.mol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > I would like to start the voting thread for KIP-225. > > This KIP proposes to correct some lag metrics emitted by the consumer. > > > > The KIP wiki is here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/uaBzB > > > > The discussion thread is here: > > http://search-hadoop.com/m/Kafka/uyzND1F33uL19AYx/threaded > > > > Also could someone assign me to this Jira: KAFKA-5890 > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5890> > > > > Thanks, > > -- > > Charly Molter > > > > > > -- > Charly Molter >