Yes James you are right.
I wasn't sure what to do about it and followed what happened with BytesOut
in KIP-153 which completely changed meaning without any deprecation window.
I'm happy to adapt my KIP if the community thinks we should duplicate the
metric for a while.

Thanks!

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 8:13 AM, James Cheng <wushuja...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This KIP will break backwards compatibility for anyone who is using the
> existing attribute names.
>
> Kafka devs, I believe that metrics are a supported interface, and so this
> would be a breaking change. In order to do this, we would need a
> deprecation timeframe for the old metric, and a transition plan to the new
> name. Is that right? I'm not sure how we deprecate metrics...
>
> During the deprecation timeframe, we could duplicate the metric to the new
> name.
>
> -James
>
> On Nov 13, 2017, at 6:09 AM, charly molter <charly.mol...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > There doesn't seem to be much opposition to this KIP, I'll leave a couple
> > more days before starting the vote.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:59 PM, charly molter <charly.mol...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'd like to start the discussion on KIP-225.
> >>
> >> This KIP tries to correct the way the consumer lag metrics are reported
> to
> >> use built in tags from MetricName.
> >>
> >> Here's the link:
> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.
> action?pageId=74686649
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> --
> >> Charly Molter
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Charly Molter
>
>


-- 
Charly Molter

Reply via email to