Jun,

Thanks for the feedback. Some things need to make sure. Currently, these 
new-added metrics follow the exact naming convention with those 'lag' 
counterparts, as shown below:

[cid:fcb78ea1-d9ac-48f4-a4ac-4fca7208af11]

Consumer-level metric:

records-lag-max ==> records-lead-min


Partition-level metrics:

<topic>-<partitionId>.records-lag          ==> 
<topic>-<partitionId>.records-lead

<topic>-<partitionId>.records-lag-max ==> <topic>-<partitionId>.records-lead-min

<topic>-<partitionId>.records-lag-avg   ==> 
<topic>-<partitionId>.records-lead-avg


Correct me if I am wrong, but what you mentioned `records-lead-avg and 
records-lead-min don't need the partition prefix since they are aggregates 
across all partitions` seemed to break the naming rule above. Do we still have 
to keep the same rule with the "lag" metrics?


huxihx




________________________________
发件人: Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io>
发送时间: 2017年11月14日 1:48
收件人: dev@kafka.apache.org
主题: Re: [DISCUSS]KIP-223 - Add per-topic min lead and per-partition lead 
metrics to KafkaConsumer

Hi, Hu,

Thanks for the KIP. Looks good overall. Could you document the mbean name
for the new metrics? We probably want the name to be consistent with
records-max-lag as described in
http://kafka.apache.org/documentation/#monitoring. Also, it seems that
[http://apache-kafka.org/images/apache-kafka.png]<http://kafka.apache.org/documentation/#monitoring>

Apache Kafka<http://kafka.apache.org/documentation/#monitoring>
kafka.apache.org
1.2 Use Cases. Here is a description of a few of the popular use cases for 
Apache Kafka®. For an overview of a number of these areas in action, see this 
blog post.



records-lead-avg and records-lead-min don't need the partition prefix since
they are aggregates across all partitions. For records-lead, it seems that
it's better to add the topic partition as a tag, instead of as a prefix in
the metric name.

Jun




On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Hu Xi <huxi...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
>
> As per Jun Rao's suggestion, I opened up the KIP-223(https://cwiki.apache.
> org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-223+-+Add+per-topic+min+
> lead+and+per-partition+lead+metrics+to+KafkaConsumer) concerning adding
> new kinds of lag metrics for KafkaConsumer. Be free to leave your comments
> here. Thanks in advance.
>
>

Reply via email to