Thanks for the KIP. Are you familiar with KIP-161?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-161%3A+streams+deserialization+exception+handlers I thinks, we should align the design (parameter naming, return types, class names etc) of KIP-210 to KIP-161 to get a unified user experience. -Matthias On 10/18/17 4:20 PM, Matt Farmer wrote: > I’ll create the JIRA ticket. > > I think that config name will work. I’ll update the KIP accordingly. > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 6:09 PM Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Can you create JIRA that corresponds to the KIP ? >> >> For the new config, how about naming it >> production.exception.processor.class >> ? This way it is clear that class name should be specified. >> >> Cheers >> >> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Matt Farmer <m...@frmr.me> wrote: >> >>> Hello everyone, >>> >>> This is the discussion thread for the KIP that I just filed here: >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- >>> 210+-+Provide+for+custom+error+handling++when+Kafka+ >>> Streams+fails+to+produce >>> >>> Looking forward to getting some feedback from folks about this idea and >>> working toward a solution we can contribute back. :) >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Matt Farmer >>> >> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
