Huge +1 !
Clients getting no feedback when failing SASL authentication is a
major source of confusion. Thanks for the KIP

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Manikumar <manikumar.re...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 12:37 AM, Vahid S Hashemian <
> vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Thanks Rajini.
>>
>> --Vahid
>>
>>
>>
>> From:   Edoardo Comar <eco...@uk.ibm.com>
>> To:     dev@kafka.apache.org
>> Date:   08/24/2017 10:55 AM
>> Subject:        Re: [VOTE] KIP-152 - Improve diagnostics for SASL
>> authentication failures
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks Rajini!
>>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>> --------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Edoardo Comar
>>
>> IBM Message Hub
>>
>> IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
>>
>>
>>
>> From:   Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com>
>> To:     dev <dev@kafka.apache.org>
>> Date:   24/08/2017 18:30
>> Subject:        [VOTE] KIP-152 - Improve diagnostics for SASL
>> authentication failures
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would like to start vote on KIP-152 to improve diagnostics of
>> authentication failures and to update clients to treat authentication
>> failures as fatal exceptions rather than transient errors:
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__cwiki.
>> apache.org_confluence_display_KAFKA_KIP-2D152-2B-2D-
>> 2BImprove-2Bdiagnostics-2Bfor-2BSASL-2Bauthentication-
>> 2Bfailures&d=DwIBAg&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=Q_
>> itwloTQj3_xUKl7Nzswo6KE4Nj-kjJc7uSVcviKUc&m=oomurFvX7GYTMP0ZlfXU8eQSS68Mfe
>> CQYhvtB7zXrCw&s=AaHp43w6RWNlh_1HZc6_rdangxC-oXMWHz7XR6i0suA&e=
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you...
>>
>> Rajini
>>
>>
>>
>> Unless stated otherwise above:
>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
>> 741598.
>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to