Hi, Rajini, 1. Yammer doesn't seem to support expiration. I guess we can use the Kafka metric in this case.
Thanks, Jun On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 4:53 PM, Roger Hoover <roger.hoo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Rajini, > > The table is super helpful. Thank you. > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Rajini Sivaram <rajinisiva...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Roger, > > > > Thank you for the review. I have added a table with the scope of errors > > counted for each request. > > > > Regards, > > > > Rajini > > > > On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:05 AM, Roger Hoover <roger.hoo...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > I think it would useful to make clear somewhere for each metric, the > > level > > > at which it's counted. I don't know all the details of the Kafka > > protocol > > > but it might be something like > > > > > > ProduceRequest, Fetch Request - counted at per-partition level > > > All other requests are 1:1 with client requests? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Roger > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Roger Hoover <roger.hoo...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Rajini, > > > > > > > > Thank you for the KIP. These are very helpful additions. One > question > > > on > > > > the error code metrics: > > > > > > > > Will the total error counting happen at the the level of topic > > partition? > > > > For example, if a single ProduceRequest contains messages to append > to > > 3 > > > > partitions and say all 3 appends are successful, the counter > > > > for kafka.network:type=RequestMetrics,name=ErrorsPerSec,request= > > > ProduceRequest,error=0 > > > > will be incremented by 3? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Roger > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Rajini Sivaram < > > > rajinisiva...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> I have created a KIP to add some additional metrics to support > health > > > >> checks: > > > >> > > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-188+-+ > > > >> Add+new+metrics+to+support+health+checks > > > >> > > > >> Feedback and suggestions are welcome. > > > >> > > > >> Regards, > > > >> > > > >> Rajini > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
