Hi,
The Vote for this KIP is now closed.
KIP-173 has been accepted with
3 binding (Guozhang, Damian, Ismael)
2 non-binding (Eno, Gouzhang)

Thanks,
Damian

On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 at 14:29 Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote:

> Yes, I know it is a separate thread in the archives, it's just that Gmail's
> algorithm decided to place it under the same thread. This is a recurring
> problem and it affects discoverability of vote threads for Gmail users (I
> assume there are many such users).
>
> Ismael
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:32 AM, Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Ismael, AFAICT it is already a separate thread:
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/kafka-dev/201707.mbox/%
> > 3ccajiktexrb1hbojrm7tmy1hdm_+t+psrz_6pawhnlbokp46o...@mail.gmail.com%3e
> >
> > On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 at 23:24 Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Per 1. I suggested exposing the constant since we are doing so for
> > consumer
> > > and producer configs prefix as well (CONSUMER_PREFIX, etc).
> > >
> > > Guozhang
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for the KIP, Damian. +1 (binding). A couple of minor comments:
> > > >
> > > > 1. Do we need to expose the TOPIC_PREFIX constant?
> > > > 2. The vote thread ended up inside the discuss thread in Gmail. It
> may
> > be
> > > > worth sending another email to make it clear that the vote is
> ongoing.
> > > You
> > > > can link back to this thread so that the existing votes are still
> > > counted.
> > > >
> > > > Ismael
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 4:43 AM, Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like to kick off the vote for KIP-173:
> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > > 173%3A+Add+prefix+to+StreamsConfig+to+enable+
> > setting+default+internal+
> > > > > topic+configs
> > > > >
> > > > > A PR for this can be found here: https://github.com/apache/
> > > > kafka/pull/3459
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Damian
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -- Guozhang
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to