I think this is a good chance although it's unfortunate that it's likely to break code that is parsing the output of the performance tool. Would it make sense to only enable this if an option is provided?
Ismael On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> wrote: > +Users > > Thanks for the KIP. I think tracking the rebalance time separately will > help resolve some confusion about the performance results given the > rebalance delay in KIP-134. And it seems generally useful to know how much > overhead is coming from the rebalance in any case. > > -Jason > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Hu Xi <huxi...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, I opened up a new KIP<https://cwiki.apache.org/ > > confluence/display/ARIES/KIP-177%3A+Consumer+perf+tool+ > > should+count+rebalance+time> (KIP-177) concerning consumer perf tool > > counting and showing rebalance time in the output. Be free to leave your > > comments here. Thanks in advance. > > >
