Hi Michal,

Thanks a lot for your comment. I fixed  the document.

Cheers,
Jeyhun

On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 6:49 PM Michal Borowiecki <
michal.borowie...@openbet.com> wrote:

> Hi Jeyhun,
>
> Could the proposed KeyContext.keyTs() be made more descriptive?
>
> e.g. lastUpdated() or similar? So that users don't have to read the docs
> to know it isn't the creation timestamp for instance.
> Cheers,
> MichaƂ
>
>
> On 04/06/17 01:24, Jeyhun Karimov wrote:
>
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Thanks for comments.
>
>  - why do you only consider get() and not range() and all() ?
>
>
> The corresponding jira concentrates on single key lookups. Moreover, I
> could not find a use-case to include range queries to return records with
> timestamp. However, theoritically we can include range() and all() as well.
>
>  - we cannot have a second get() (this would be ambiguous) but need
>
> another name like getWithTs() (or something better)
>
>
>  - what use case do you have in mind for getKeyTs() ? Would a single new
>
> method returning KeyContext not be sufficient?
>
>
>
> Thanks for correction, this is my bad.
>
>  - for backward compatibility, we will also need a new interface and
>
> cannot just extend the existing one
>
>
>
>  I will correct the KIP accordingly.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeyhun
>
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 7:36 AM, Matthias J. Sax <matth...@confluent.io> 
> <matth...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
>
> Thanks for the KIP Jeyhun.
>
> Some comments:
>  - why do you only consider get() and not range() and all() ?
>  - we cannot have a second get() (this would be ambiguous) but need
> another name like getWithTs() (or something better)
>  - what use case do you have in mind for getKeyTs() ? Would a single new
> method returning KeyContext not be sufficient?
>  - for backward compatibility, we will also need a new interface and
> cannot just extend the existing one
>
>
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 5/29/17 4:55 PM, Jeyhun Karimov wrote:
>
> Dear community,
>
> I want to share KIP-165 [1] based on issue KAFKA-4304 [2].
> I would like to get your comments.
>
> [1]https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
>
> 165%3A+Extend+Interactive+Queries+for+return+latest+
> update+timestamp+per+key
>
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4304
>
> Cheers,
> Jeyhun
>
>
>
>
> --
> <http://www.openbet.com/> Michal Borowiecki
> Senior Software Engineer L4
> T: +44 208 742 1600 <+44%2020%208742%201600>
>
>
> +44 203 249 8448 <+44%2020%203249%208448>
>
>
>
> E: michal.borowie...@openbet.com
> W: www.openbet.com
> OpenBet Ltd
>
> Chiswick Park Building 9
>
> 566 Chiswick High Rd
>
> London
>
> W4 5XT
>
> UK
> <https://www.openbet.com/email_promo>
> This message is confidential and intended only for the addressee. If you
> have received this message in error, please immediately notify the
> postmas...@openbet.com and delete it from your system as well as any
> copies. The content of e-mails as well as traffic data may be monitored by
> OpenBet for employment and security purposes. To protect the environment
> please do not print this e-mail unless necessary. OpenBet Ltd. Registered
> Office: Chiswick Park Building 9, 566 Chiswick High Road, London, W4 5XT,
> United Kingdom. A company registered in England and Wales. Registered no.
> 3134634. VAT no. GB927523612
>
-- 
-Cheers

Jeyhun

Reply via email to