Hi Colin, Thanks for the KIP. Looks good overall. One thing I wasn't too clear about is whether new resource types, operations, or permissions require a version bump for the three new request types. On reading the proposal, it sort of sounds like the intent is not to bump the versions and let the new type be mapped to "unknown" on clients/brokers that don't support it. Is that correct?
Thanks, Jason On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > Thanks for the KIP, +1(binding) from me. Colin, it may make sense to start > a new thread for this as GMail is currently hiding it in the middle of the > discuss thread. Please mention the date the thread was started along with > the 3 +1s (1 binding) so far. > > Ismael > > On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to start the voting for KIP-140: Add administrative RPCs for > > adding, deleting, and listing ACLs. This provides an API for adding, > > deleting, and listing the access control lists (ACLs) which are used to > > control access on Kafka topics and brokers. > > > > The wiki page is here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > 140%3A+Add+administrative+RPCs+for+adding%2C+deleting% > 2C+and+listing+ACLs > > > > The previous [DISCUSS] thread: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@kafka.apache.org/msg70858.html > > > > cheers, > > Colin > > >
