+1 (non-binding)
On Sat, May 6, 2017, at 11:13, Dana Powers wrote: > +1 ! > > On May 6, 2017 4:49 AM, "Edoardo Comar" <eco...@uk.ibm.com> wrote: > > > +1 (non binding) > > thanks > > -------------------------------------------------- > > Edoardo Comar > > IBM MessageHub > > eco...@uk.ibm.com > > IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN > > > > IBM United Kingdom Limited Registered in England and Wales with number > > 741598 Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 > > 3AU > > > > > > > > From: Jay Kreps <j...@confluent.io> > > To: dev@kafka.apache.org > > Date: 05/05/2017 23:19 > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker > > reconnect attempts > > > > > > > > +1 > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 7:29 PM Sriram Subramanian <r...@confluent.io> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:04 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > Given the simple and non controversial nature of the KIP, I would > > like > > > to > > > > > start the voting process for KIP-144: Exponential backoff for broker > > > > > reconnect attempts: > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > > > 144%3A+Exponential+ > > > > > backoff+for+broker+reconnect+attempts > > > > > > > > > > The vote will run for a minimum of 72 hours. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > *Gwen Shapira* > > > > Product Manager | Confluent > > > > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap > > > > Follow us: Twitter <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc> | blog > > > > <http://www.confluent.io/blog> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unless stated otherwise above: > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > > 741598. > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU > >
