Nice. Thanks!

-Konstantine

On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 10:43 PM, dan <dan.norw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> thanks for the feedback, it all sounds good. i have made the changes to the
> pr and the kip.
>
> dan
>
> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Konstantine Karantasis <
> konstant...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > Thank you for the KIP. It's a nice improvement.
> >
> > Two small suggestions:
> >
> > 1) Let's not use all caps to describe the type of the connector. "Source"
> > and "Sink" seem more appropriate (but even all lower case would be
> better).
> > 2) It's been discussed in other contexts recently, but I believe finally
> > exposing a connector's version here makes more sense than anywhere else
> at
> > the moment. There's an existing interface method to grab the version, and
> > publishing it through REST is not affected by any conventions made with
> > respect to versioning format (also sorting based on name and version I
> > guess is a concern that can be postponed to when we support multiple
> > versions of the same connector and this doesn't have to be addressed on a
> > KIP anyways).
> >
> > Let me know what you think. I'll add comments to the PR as well.
> > Thanks again.
> >
> > -Konstantine
> >
> > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 4:20 PM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote:
> >
> > > YES PLEASE!
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 1:48 PM, dan <dan.norw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > hello.
> > > >
> > > > in an attempt to make the connect rest endpoints more useful i'd like
> > to
> > > > add the Connector type (Sink/Source) in our rest endpoints to make
> them
> > > > more self descriptive.
> > > >
> > > > KIP here:
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > 151+Expose+Connector+type+in+REST+API
> > > > initial pr: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/2960
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > > dan
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Gwen Shapira*
> > > Product Manager | Confluent
> > > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap
> > > Follow us: Twitter <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc> | blog
> > > <http://www.confluent.io/blog>
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to