[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15971884#comment-15971884
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on KAFKA-5036:
---------------------------------------
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/2831
> Followups from KIP-101
> ----------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-5036
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5036
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.11.0.0
> Reporter: Jun Rao
> Assignee: Jun Rao
> Fix For: 0.11.0.0
>
>
> 1. It would be safer to hold onto the leader lock in Partition while serving
> an OffsetForLeaderEpoch request.
> 2. Currently, we update the leader epoch in epochCache after log append in
> the follower but before log append in the leader. It would be more consistent
> to always do this after log append. This also avoids issues related to
> failure in log append.
> 3. OffsetsForLeaderEpochRequest/OffsetsForLeaderEpochResponse:
> The code that does grouping can probably be replaced by calling
> CollectionUtils.groupDataByTopic(). Done:
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/commit/359a68510801a22630a7af275c9935fb2d4c8dbf
> 4. The following line in LeaderEpochFileCache is hit several times when
> LogTest is executed:
> {code}
> if (cachedLatestEpoch == None) error("Attempt to assign log end offset
> to epoch before epoch has been set. This should never happen.")
> {code}
> This should be an assert (with the tests fixed up)
> 5. The constructor of LeaderEpochFileCache has the following:
> {code}
> lock synchronized { ListBuffer(checkpoint.read(): _*) }
> {code}
> But everywhere else uses a read or write lock. We should use consistent
> locking.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
