Hi Mayuresh, The relevant PR was merged last Friday. :) Starting the vote is fine by me.
Ismael On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Mayuresh Gharat <gharatmayures...@gmail.com > wrote: > Hi Ismael, > > Sure we can do that. Just wanted to check on the timeline on when this can > go in. > I can wait till the new ProduceRequest gets in to trunk. > On the other hand we can also support it in the existing code. > I am fine either ways. > > Should I start Vote on this, so that we can get this approved? > > Thanks, > > Mayuresh > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:49 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > Thanks for the KIP Mayuresh. I suggest we only throw this error for > > ProduceRequest version 3, which is being introduced with KIP-98 > > (Exactly-once). That way, the compatibility story is clearer, in my > > opinion. > > > > Ismael > > > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:07 PM, Mayuresh Gharat < > > gharatmayures...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > We have created KIP-135 to propose that Kafka should return a > > non-retriable > > > error when the producer produces a message with null key to a log > > compacted > > > topic. > > > > > > Please find the KIP wiki in the link : > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > > 135+%3A+Send+of+null+key+to+a+compacted+topic+should+throw+ > > > non-retriable+error+back+to+user. > > > > > > > > > We would love to hear your comments and suggestions. > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Mayuresh > > > > > > > > > -- > -Regards, > Mayuresh R. Gharat > (862) 250-7125 >
