This vote has passed with four binding (Jun, Ismael, Becket, Guozhang) and
two non-binding (Roger, me) +1s.

Thank you all for the feedback and votes. I will update the KIP page and
submit a PR.

Regards,

Rajini

On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1. Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks for driving through this, Rajini :)
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Roger Hoover <roger.hoo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Rajini,
> > >
> > > This is great.  Thank you.  +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > Roger
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 8:55 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Rajini,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the proposal and for addressing the (sometimes
> > contradictory)
> > > > feedback. :) +1 (binding) from me.
> > > >
> > > > Ismael
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Rajini Sivaram <
> > rajinisiva...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I would like to initiate the voting process for KIP-124:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > > > > 124+-+Request+rate+quotas
> > > > >
> > > > > The KIP proposes to add request processing time quota to limit CPU
> > > > > utilization at *<client-id>*, *<user>* or *<user, client-id>*
> levels
> > > > > similar to the current bandwidth limiting quotas. The quota takes
> > into
> > > > > account the total time spent by the user/client on request handler
> > and
> > > > > network threads within a quota window. Quota will be configured as
> a
> > > > > per-thread percentage value, which typically indicates the
> percentage
> > > of
> > > > > CPU cores allocated to the user/client.
> > > > >
> > > > > The discussion thread is here:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
> 46c7bbc8f381ebe718b3cce6ed8bdf
> > > > > 3745df22b0bd88020d70c99813@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
> > > > >
> > > > > Many thanks to everyone for the feedback and suggestions so far.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Rajini
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> -- Guozhang
>

Reply via email to