+1 This looks super useful! Might be worth mentioning somewhere compatibility with the old consumer. It looks like offsets in zk are not covered, which seems fine, but probably should be explicitly noted. Maybe you can also add a note saying that the tool can be used for old consumers which have offsets stored in Kafka, but it will not protect against an active consumer group in that case?
Thanks, Jason On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Dong Lin <lindon...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Grant Henke <ghe...@cloudera.com> > wrote: > > > > > +1. Agreed. This is a great tool to have. > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:33 AM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> > > wrote: > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > Nice job - this is going to be super useful. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya < > > > > quilcate.jo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > > > It seems that there is no further concern with the KIP-122. > > > > > At this point we would like to start the voting process. > > > > > > > > > > The KIP can be found here: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > > > > 122%3A+Add+Reset+Consumer+Group+Offsets+tooling > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > Jorge. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > *Gwen Shapira* > > > > Product Manager | Confluent > > > > 650.450.2760 | @gwenshap > > > > Follow us: Twitter <https://twitter.com/ConfluentInc> | blog > > > > <http://www.confluent.io/blog> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Grant Henke > > > Software Engineer | Cloudera > > > gr...@cloudera.com | twitter.com/gchenke | linkedin.com/in/granthenke > > > > > >
