[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15924238#comment-15924238
 ] 

Damian Guy edited comment on KAFKA-4609 at 3/14/17 2:07 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------

[~miguno] It is because the caches are flushed independently and both KTables 
trigger the join, i.e., assuming you have {{table1.join(table2)}} and within a 
single commit interval you received:

table1 A:1
table2 A:A

when the stores are flushed on the commit interval. We flush the store for 
table1, this triggers the join and produces A:1:A. We then flush table2, this 
triggers the join and produce A:1:A


was (Author: damianguy):
[~miguno] It is because the caches are flushed independently and both KTables 
trigger the join, i.e., assuming you have {table1.join(table2)} and within a 
single commit interval you received:

table1 A:1
table2 A:A

when the stores are flushed on the commit interval. We flush the store for 
table1, this triggers the join and produces A:1:A. We then flush table2, this 
triggers the join and produce A:1:A

> KTable/KTable join followed by groupBy and aggregate/count can result in 
> incorrect results
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-4609
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4609
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: streams
>    Affects Versions: 0.10.1.1, 0.10.2.0
>            Reporter: Damian Guy
>            Assignee: Damian Guy
>              Labels: architecture
>
> When caching is enabled, KTable/KTable joins can result in duplicate values 
> being emitted. This will occur if there were updates to the same key in both 
> tables. Each table is flushed independently, and each table will trigger the 
> join, so you get two results for the same key. 
> If we subsequently perform a groupBy and then aggregate operation we will now 
> process these duplicates resulting in incorrect aggregated values. For 
> example count will be double the value it should be.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to