+1

Since this is an unusual one, I think it's worth pointing out that the KIP
notes it is really a bug fix, but since it has compatibility implications
the KIP was worth it. It was a sort of intentional bug, but confusing and
dangerous.

Seems important to fix this ASAP since people are hitting this in practice
and would have to go out of their way to set up monitoring to catch the
issue.

-Ewen

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> wrote:

> +1 from me. The current behavior seems both surprising and dangerous.
>
> -Jason
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Onur Karaman <
> onurkaraman.apa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey everyone.
> >
> > I made a bug-fix KIP-115 to enforce offsets.topic.replication.factor:
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
> > 115%3A+Enforce+offsets.topic.replication.factor
> >
> > Comments are welcome.
> >
> > - Onur
> >
>

Reply via email to