I don't understand why the whole dev list needs to be notified of failed
email deliveries.

Is there a way to shut these off?




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: postmas...@inn.ru (JIRA) <j...@apache.org>
Date: Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:50 PM
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-1207) Launch Kafka from within Apache
Mesos
To: dev@kafka.apache.org



    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1207?page=
com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-
tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15827464#comment-15827464 ]

postmas...@inn.ru commented on KAFKA-1207:
------------------------------------------

Delivery is delayed to these recipients or groups:

e...@inn.ru<mailto:e...@inn.ru>

Subject: [jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-1207) Launch Kafka from within Apache
Mesos

This message hasn't been delivered yet. Delivery will continue to be
attempted.

The server will keep trying to deliver this message for the next 1 days, 19
hours and 51 minutes. You'll be notified if the message can't be delivered
by that time.







Diagnostic information for administrators:

Generating server: lc-exch-02.inn.local
Receiving server: inn.ru (109.105.153.25)

e...@inn.ru
Server at inn.ru (109.105.153.25) returned '400 4.4.7 Message delayed'
1/18/2017 5:38:42 AM - Server at inn.ru (109.105.153.25) returned '441
4.4.1 Error communicating with target host: "Failed to connect. Winsock
error code: 10060, Win32 error code: 10060." Last endpoint attempted was
109.105.153.25:25'

Original message headers:

Received: from lc-exch-04.inn.local (10.64.37.99) by lc-exch-02.inn.local
 (10.64.37.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
 cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.669.32; Wed, 18
 Jan 2017 04:40:33 +0300
Received: from lc-asp-02.inn.ru (10.64.37.105) by lc-exch-04.inn.local
 (10.64.37.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2,
 cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.669.32 via
 Frontend Transport; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 04:40:33 +0300
Received-SPF: None (no SPF record) identity=mailfrom;
client-ip=209.188.14.142; helo=spamd1-us-west.apache.org; envelope-from=
j...@apache.org; receiver=e...@inn.ru
X-Envelope-From: <j...@apache.org>
Received: from spamd1-us-west.apache.org (pnap-us-west-generic-nat.
apache.org [209.188.14.142])
        by lc-asp-02.inn.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D8B400C3
        for <e...@inn.ru>; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 02:40:32 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at
spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id B4F2DC25B1
        for <e...@inn.ru>; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 01:40:31 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31
        tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.999,
        URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled
Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8])
        by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new,
port 10024)
        with ESMTP id lxl1Bv2BWoLB for <e...@inn.ru>;
        Wed, 18 Jan 2017 01:40:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org
[209.188.14.139])
        by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org)
with ESMTP id 33F315FC87
        for <e...@inn.ru>; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 01:40:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139])
        by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at
mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C9A42E867E
        for <e...@inn.ru>; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 01:40:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org)
with ESMTP id 1E11B25295
        for <e...@inn.ru>; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 01:40:27 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 01:40:27 +0000
From: "postmas...@inn.ru (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
To: <e...@inn.ru>
Message-ID: <jira.12689059.1389811935000.35854.1484703627...@atlassian.jira>
In-Reply-To: <jira.12689059.1389811935...@atlassian.jira>
References: <jira.12689059.1389811935...@atlassian.jira> <
jira.12689059.1389811935...@jira-lw-us.apache.org>
Subject: [jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-1207) Launch Kafka from within Apache
 Mesos
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394
X-inn-MailScanner-ESVA-Information: Please contact  for more information
X-inn-MailScanner-ESVA-ID: 51D8B400C3.A6AA1
X-inn-MailScanner-ESVA: Found to be clean
X-inn-MailScanner-ESVA-From: j...@apache.org
X-inn-MailScanner-ESVA-Watermark: 1485308433.01128@ko+T+VvxU2LmvLEwrJMO8w
Return-Path: j...@apache.org
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: lc-exch-02.inn.local
X-CrossPremisesHeadersFilteredByDsnGenerator: lc-exch-02.inn.local



> Launch Kafka from within Apache Mesos
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-1207
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1207
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Joe Stein
>              Labels: mesos
>         Attachments: KAFKA-1207_2014-01-19_00:04:58.patch,
KAFKA-1207_2014-01-19_00:48:49.patch, KAFKA-1207.patch
>
>
> There are a few components to this.
> 1) The Framework:  This is going to be responsible for starting up and
managing the fail over of brokers within the mesos cluster.  This will have
to get some Kafka focused paramaters for launching new replica brokers,
moving topics and partitions around based on what is happening in the grid
through time.
> 2) The Scheduler: This is what is going to ask for resources for Kafka
brokers (new ones, replacement ones, commissioned ones) and other
operations such as stopping tasks (decommissioning brokers).  I think this
should also expose a user interface (or at least a rest api) for producers
and consumers so we can have producers and consumers run inside of the
mesos cluster if folks want (just add the jar)
> 3) The Executor : This is the task launcher.  It launches tasks kills
them off.
> 4) Sharing data between Scheduler and Executor: I looked at the a few
implementations of this.  I like parts of the Storm implementation but
think using the environment variable
ExectorInfo.CommandInfo.Enviornment.Variables[]
is the best shot.  We can have a command line
bin/kafka-mesos-scheduler-start.sh
that would build the contrib project if not already built and support
conf/server.properties to start.
> The Framework and operating Scheduler would run in on an administrative
node.  I am probably going to hook Apache Curator into it so it can do it's
own failure to a another follower.  Running more than 2 should be
sufficient as long as it can bring back it's state (e.g. from zk).  I think
we can add this in after once everything is working.
> Additional detail can be found on the Wiki page https://cwiki.apache.org/
confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=38570672



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to