[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2500?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15823420#comment-15823420
 ] 

Ewen Cheslack-Postava commented on KAFKA-2500:
----------------------------------------------

[~hachikuji] [~rmetzger] [~willf] In light of 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-92+-+Add+per+partition+lag+metrics+to+KafkaConsumer
 and the fact that metrics are exposed by the Consumer, should we consider just 
not implementing this? It looks like the same info (in a slightly different 
form) is now available via a different mechanism now.

> Expose fetch response high watermark in ConsumerRecords
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-2500
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2500
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: consumer
>    Affects Versions: 0.9.0.0
>            Reporter: Will Funnell
>            Assignee: Jason Gustafson
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.10.2.0
>
>
> Originally created in the old consumer here: 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-1977
> The requirement is to create a snapshot from the Kafka topic but NOT do 
> continual reads after that point. For example you might be creating a backup 
> of the data to a file.
> This ticket covers the addition of the functionality to the new consumer.
> In order to achieve that, a recommended solution by Joel Koshy and Jay Kreps 
> was to expose the high watermark, as maxEndOffset, from the FetchResponse 
> object through to each MessageAndMetadata object in order to be aware when 
> the consumer has reached the end of each partition.
> The submitted patch achieves this by adding the maxEndOffset to the 
> PartitionTopicInfo, which is updated when a new message arrives in the 
> ConsumerFetcherThread and then exposed in MessageAndMetadata.
> See here for discussion:
> http://search-hadoop.com/m/4TaT4TpJy71



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to