Yes, that's correct. Ismael
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 11:02 AM, BigData dev <bigdatadev...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ashish, Ismael > Thanks for Info. > So on Kafka Cluster (With out any security enabled) I can add ACLS with IP > address. > Is that correct? > > > Thanks, > Bharat > > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Ashish Singh <asi...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > > Ismael, thanks for the correction. I assumed the question was targeted > for > > without any security enabled, but yea even then IP based auth is > possible. > > > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > > > It is possible to use ACLs with IPs or other SASL mechanisms (PLAIN for > > > example). So Kerberos and SSL are not required (although commonly > used). > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Ashish Singh <asi...@cloudera.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > > > No it does not. Without kerberos or ssl, all requests will appear to > > come > > > > from anonymous user, and as long as a user is not identified it is > not > > > > possible to do authorization on. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 10:40 AM, BigData dev < > bigdatadev...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > I have a question here, Does Kafka support ACL's with out > > kerberos/SSL? > > > > > > > > > > Any info on this would be greatly helpful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Ashish > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Regards, > > Ashish > > >
