I am closing this vote now. KIP-93 is accepted with

+3 (binding)
+2 (non-binding)

Thanks for feedback on DISCUSS thread and voting.

-Matthias


On 11/30/16 9:29 AM, Sriram Subramanian wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> 
> I second Ewen's point about compatibility.
> 
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 2:53 AM, Damian Guy <damian....@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 at 05:58 Ewen Cheslack-Postava <e...@confluent.io>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding).
>>>
>>> Also, see my notes in discussion thread around future compatibility
>>> discussions for breaking plugin interface changes like this.
>>>
>>> -Ewen
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Guozhang Wang <wangg...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Bill Bejeck <bbej...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Bill
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Matthias J. Sax <
>>> matth...@confluent.io>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I’d like to start the voting process for KIP-93:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-
>>>>>> 93%3A+Improve+invalid+timestamp+handling+in+Kafka+Streams
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Matthias
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> -- Guozhang
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ewen
>>>
>>
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to