Thanks for the update Jason. :)

Ismael

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:28 AM, Jason Gustafson <ja...@confluent.io> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Pardon all the JIRA noise, but I've been busy reducing the scope to match
> the available time since we're now 6 days from the code freeze. I've pruned
> the list to about 30 tickets, some of which probably won't get in:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+0.10.1.
> Other
> than a few important bug fixes which are nearing completion, the main
> remaining items are documentation improvements, additional system tests,
> and transient test failures. If you are looking to help out, addressing the
> transient test failures are the biggest need since I'm sure you've noticed
> all the build failures. Other than that, I think we're on track for the
> code freeze. Keep up the great work!
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
>
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 3:18 PM, Mayuresh Gharat <
> gharatmayures...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Great !
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Mayuresh
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Becket Qin <becket....@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Awesome!
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Neha Narkhede <n...@confluent.io>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Nice!
> > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:33 PM Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Well done everyone. :)
> > > > >
> > > > > On 20 Sep 2016 5:23 am, "Jason Gustafson" <ja...@confluent.io>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks everyone for the hard work! The 0.10.1 release branch has
> > been
> > > > > > created. We're now entering the stabilization phase of this
> release
> > > > which
> > > > > > means we'll focus on bug fixes and testing.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Jason
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 5:00 PM, Jason Gustafson <
> > ja...@confluent.io
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks everyone for the hard work! Here's an update on the
> > > remaining
> > > > > KIPs
> > > > > > > that we are hoping to include:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > KIP-78 (clusterId): Review is basically complete. Assuming no
> > > > problems
> > > > > > > emerge, Ismael is planning to merge today.
> > > > > > > KIP-74 (max fetch size): Review is nearing completion, just a
> few
> > > > minor
> > > > > > > issues remain. This will probably be merged tomorrow or Sunday.
> > > > > > > KIP-55 (secure quotas): The patch has been rebased and probably
> > > needs
> > > > > one
> > > > > > > more review pass before merging. Jun is confident it can get in
> > > > before
> > > > > > > Monday.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As for KIP-79, I've made one review pass, but to make it in,
> > we'll
> > > > need
> > > > > > 1)
> > > > > > > some more votes on the vote thread, and 2) a few review
> > iterations.
> > > > > It's
> > > > > > > looking a bit doubtful, but let's see how it goes!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Since we are nearing the feature freeze, it would be helpful if
> > > > people
> > > > > > > begin setting some priorities on the bugs that need to get in
> > > before
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > code freeze. I am going to make an effort to prune the list
> early
> > > > next
> > > > > > > week, so if there are any critical issues you know about, make
> > sure
> > > > > they
> > > > > > > are marked as such.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Jason
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Neha
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > -Regards,
> > Mayuresh R. Gharat
> > (862) 250-7125
> >
>

Reply via email to