OK, thanks. Just making sure. :) Ismael
On 31 Aug 2016 5:47 pm, "Jim Jagielski" <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > As I said, just a general reminder... > > It is good, I think, to have them every so often to reinforce things. > Sometimes it is easy to get "lazy" about it :) > > > On Aug 31, 2016, at 12:34 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > > Hi Jim, > > > > Thanks for the feedback. More inline. > > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > > >> Just a reminder that these kinds of meetings are, by their very nature, > >> synchronous and disenfranchise those members of the community unable to > >> attend. > >> > >> It is great that discussions and videos are brought back to the > >> list BUT they should not be "this is what has been decided" or > >> "this is what we are going to do" kinds of results. > >> > > > > Was there something specific of this sort that concerned you? In general, > > we follow up on the mailing list (and wiki for KIPs). Also, the mailing > > list is where all the votes take place. I couldn't find any examples > where > > we decided a course of action in the meeting, but I could have missed > > something. > > > > Please recall the Apache theme: If it didn't happen on the (dev) list, > >> it didn't happen at all. > >> > > > > Of course. > > > > Ismael > >
