+1. On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Jun Rao <j...@confluent.io> wrote:
> Vahid, > > Thanks for the clear explanation in the KIP. +1 > > Jun > > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Vahid S Hashemian < > vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > I would like to initiate the voting process for KIP-70 ( > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP- > > 70%3A+Revise+Partition+Assignment+Semantics+on+New+ > > Consumer%27s+Subscription+Change > > ). > > > > The only issue that was discussed in the discussion thread is > > compatibility, but because it applies to an edge case, it is not expected > > to impact existing users. > > The proposal was shared with Spark and Storm users and no issue was > raised > > by those communities. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Regards, > > --Vahid > > > > > -- -- Guozhang
