Thanks all, looks like the vote passed with +5 binding and +1 non-binding. I'll update the KIP page.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 12:54 PM Ewen Cheslack-Postava <e...@confluent.io> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > -Ewen > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > > > +1 (binding), provided that we make the usage of `Long/null` versus > > `long/-1` consistent. > > > > Ismael > > > > On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 12:42 AM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:59 AM, Shikhar Bhushan < > shik...@confluent.io> > > > wrote: > > > > Since there isn't much to discuss with this KIP, bringing it to a > vote > > > > > > > > KIP: > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-65%3A+Expose+timestamps+to+Connect > > > > > > > > Pull request: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/1537 > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Shikhar > > > > > > > > > -- > Thanks, > Ewen >
