Yes, for consistency, perhaps we can allow client-id quota to be configured dynamically too and mark the static config in the broker as deprecated. If both are set, the dynamic one wins.
Thanks, Jun On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:56 AM, Ismael Juma <ism...@juma.me.uk> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Rajini Sivaram < > rajinisiva...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > It is actually quite tempting to do the same for client-id quotas as > well, > > but I suppose we can't break existing users who have configured defaults > in > > server.properties and providing two ways of setting client-id defaults > > would be just too confusing. > > > > Using two different approaches for client-id versus user quota defaults is > also not great. We could deprecate the server.properties default configs > for client-id quotas and remove them in the future. In the meantime, we > would have to live with 2 level defaults. > > Jun, what are your thoughts on this? > > Ismael >
