[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15302150#comment-15302150
]
Dustin Cote commented on KAFKA-2394:
------------------------------------
[~hachikuji] the attached PR removes references to the DailyRollingFileAppender
because it's not just at risk when you have spamming logging, but over the long
term, the DailyRollingFileAppender has no cleanup policy that I know of by
default. It also has known issues with [losing log
messages|https://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/apidocs/org/apache/log4j/DailyRollingFileAppender.html].
I think it's good to scrub DailyRollingFileAppender completely and notify of
the format change for logging or add the log4j extras to the dependency list to
match the formatting. I prefer just changing the naming convention of the
files but am certainly open to discussion. Thanks!
> Use RollingFileAppender by default in log4j.properties
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-2394
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2394
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Jason Gustafson
> Assignee: jin xing
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: newbie
> Attachments: log4j.properties.patch
>
>
> The default log4j.properties bundled with Kafka uses ConsoleAppender and
> DailyRollingFileAppender, which offer no protection to users from spammy
> logging. In extreme cases (such as when issues like KAFKA-1461 are
> encountered), the logs can exhaust the local disk space. This could be a
> problem for Kafka adoption since new users are less likely to adjust the
> logging properties themselves, and are more likely to have configuration
> problems which result in log spam.
> To fix this, we can use RollingFileAppender, which offers two settings for
> controlling the maximum space that log files will use.
> maxBackupIndex: how many backup files to retain
> maxFileSize: the max size of each log file
> One question is whether this change is a compatibility concern? The backup
> strategy and filenames used by RollingFileAppender are different from those
> used by DailyRollingFileAppender, so any tools which depend on the old format
> will break. If we think this is a serious problem, one solution would be to
> provide two versions of log4j.properties and add a flag to enable the new
> one. Another solution would be to include the RollingFileAppender
> configuration in the default log4j.properties, but commented out.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
