[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3511?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15298244#comment-15298244
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on KAFKA-3511:
---------------------------------------
GitHub user enothereska opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/1424
KAFKA-3511: Initial commit for aggregators [WiP]
Initial structure. Removed initialiser. Two simple aggregators.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/enothereska/kafka KAFKA-3511-sum-avg
Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:
https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/1424.patch
To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:
This closes #1424
----
commit 18416bb213b6eaa3fa5952af67dc5396204e247c
Author: Eno Thereska <eno.there...@gmail.com>
Date: 2016-05-24T14:25:47Z
Initial commit for aggregators
----
> Add common aggregation functions like Sum and Avg as build-ins in Kafka
> Streams DSL
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-3511
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3511
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: streams
> Reporter: Guozhang Wang
> Assignee: Eno Thereska
> Labels: api
> Fix For: 0.10.1.0
>
>
> Currently we have the following aggregation APIs in the Streams DSL:
> {code}
> KStream.aggregateByKey(..)
> KStream.reduceByKey(..)
> KStream.countByKey(..)
> KTable.groupBy(...).aggregate(..)
> KTable.groupBy(...).reduce(..)
> KTable.groupBy(...).count(..)
> {code}
> And it is better to add common aggregation functions like Sum and Avg as
> built-in into the Streams DSL. A few questions to ask though:
> 1. Should we add those built-in functions as, for example
> {{KTable.groupBy(...).sum(...)} or {{KTable.groupBy(...).aggregate(SUM,
> ...)}}. Please see the comments below for detailed pros and cons.
> 2. If we go with the second option above, should we replace the countByKey /
> count operators with aggregate(COUNT) as well? Personally I (Guozhang) feel
> it is not necessary, as COUNT is a special aggregate function since we do not
> need to map on any value fields; this is the same approach as in Spark as
> well, where Count is built-in as first-citizen in the DSL, and others are
> built-in as {{aggregate(SUM)}}, etc.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
